Lawn ex rel. Lawn v. Wasserman

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Lawn ex rel. Lawn v. Wasserman, 248 So. 2d 548 (1971)
1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6557
Bark, Carroll, Dull, Hendry

Lawn ex rel. Lawn v. Wasserman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff-appellants, the Lawns, appeal from a jury verdict entered in a trial as to damages only, based upon the opening of a default judgment ordered by this court in Lawn v. Wasserman, Fla.App.1969, 226 So.2d 261.

During a reported conference as to proposed jury instructions, the trial judge stated: “The objections are noted. The court will instruct on any loss of ability to earn money in the future.” The requested Florida Standard Jury Instruction § 6.2 was not actually given.

Our sister appellate courts have passed upon the failure of a trial judge to give a requested charge as to loss of ability to earn money in the future, where the judge had earlier ruled that he would give such an instruction. Capone v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 175, 177-178 and Powell v. Hegney, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 599. They have held that this is reversible error. We agree, and reverse and remand for a new trial as to damages only. Therefore, we express no view as to the other points raised.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial as to damages only.

Reference

Full Case Name
Craig LAWN, a minor by his father and next friend, Roy Lawn, and Roy Lawn, Individually v. Irving WASSERMAN and Sheldon Wasserman
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published