Still v. Ramada Inn
Still v. Ramada Inn
251 So. 2d 544; 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 7087
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Still v. Ramada Inn
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the denial of unemployment benefits to him is not supported by the evidence, nor that Respondent Industrial Relations Commission departed from essential requirements of law in entering the decision appealed herein.
The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.