Russell v. State
Russell v. State
252 So. 2d 403; 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6020
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Russell v. State
Opinion of the Court
The only question raised on this appeal, from appellant’s conviction of assault with intent to commit a felony to wit: robbery, is the sufficiency of the proof of his intent to commit robbery. The evidence is clearly sufficient under the rule stated in Simpson v. State, 81 Fla. 292, 87 So. 920, 921 (1921).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.