Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1972

Finesmith v. Grossman

Finesmith v. Grossman
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 25, 1972 · Hendry, Liles, Swann, Woodie
257 So. 2d 99; 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 7341 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Finesmith v. Grossman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment for the defendants.

The final judgment contained three findings of fact. An examination of the record and briefs demonstrates that the trial court did not commit any error in this finding of fact in Paragraph Three.

“3. The proceedings in those certain actions contained in the original Court files introduced as Plaintiffs’ Exhibits ‘8’ and ‘9’, are not binding upon the Defendants in this Cause as said exhibits affirmatively, indicate that the Defendants were not parties to those proceedings and that the Plaintiff has failed to establish that the Defendants in the present cause had notice of said proceedings.”

The validity of Paragraph Three makes plaintiffs’ arguments for reversal under Points One and Two moot.

The final judgment is, therefore,

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.