Cosentino v. Elson
Cosentino v. Elson
263 So. 2d 253; 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Nova Ins. Group v. Dept. of Ins. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
- Fla. Psc v. Pruitt, Humphress (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
- Central National Bank v. Broadview Savings & Loan Co. (Ohio Ct. App. 1979)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The order of the trial court, here under review, be and the same is hereby affirmed. Funds in escrow are not subject to garnishment [see: 6 Am.Jur.2d, Attachment and Garnishment, § 125; 28 Am.Jur.2d, Escrow, § 10; 38 C.J.S. Garnishment § 77c(l); Anno. 10 A.L.R. 741] except where all conditions of the escrow had been completed and the funds without dispute are due to a judgment debtor.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.