Cosentino v. Elson

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Cosentino v. Elson, 263 So. 2d 253 (1972)
1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6599
Barkdull, Haverfield, Pearson

Cosentino v. Elson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order of the trial court, here under review, be and the same is hereby affirmed. Funds in escrow are not subject to garnishment [see: 6 Am.Jur.2d, Attachment and Garnishment, § 125; 28 Am.Jur.2d, Escrow, § 10; 38 C.J.S. Garnishment § 77c(l); Anno. 10 A.L.R. 741] except where all conditions of the escrow had been completed and the funds without dispute are due to a judgment debtor.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Alfred A. COSENTINO and David B. Gam, d/b/a Cosentino and Gam, Engineers v. Jerome ELSON and Heiman and Crary, P.A.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published