Gardner v. State
Gardner v. State
263 So. 2d 604; 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Opinion of the Court
We have examined the briefs and record filed in this appeal. We conclude that the requirements of Ch. 932.38, F.S.1969, now Ch. 925.07, F.S.1970, F.S.A. and of Snell v. Mayo, Fla.1956, 84 So.2d 581, were complied with, in that actual timely notice was received by defendant’s grandmother-guardian. We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.