Brant v. Brooks
Brant v. Brooks
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Brant appeals an adverse judgment in a suit for ejectment, entitling
Appellant did not include in the record on appeal appellee’s complaint, motion for summary judgment, attached affidavits, or the testimony or a stipulated statement of the evidence produced at the hearing on damages. This Court deferred action on appellee’s motion to quash the appeal until consideration of the appeal on the merits.
The record is insufficient to determine whether or not the trial Court committed error in entering the final judgment appealed. We, therefore, affirm the action of the trial Court. Castaldo v. Singapore, J. F. Inc., Fla.App.1972, 258 So.2d 499; Speight v. Dulimba, Fla.App.1968, 208 So.2d 833; Belfield v. Lochner, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 668; Beyer v. Carey, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 373.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.