Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1972

Dilberth v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 17, 1972 · Carroll, Hendry, Pearson

267 So. 2d 661; 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6163 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Brookins v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals his conviction and sentence for the crime of robbery. The evidence established that he stabbed his victim and was apprehended a short time later near the scene of the crime. He had blood on his clothes. He was identified by the victim.

On this appeal, it is urged that the evidence of the identity of the defendant as *662the perpetrator of the crime is insufficient. We have determined that this contention has no merit. See State v. Sebastian, Fla. 1965, 171 So.2d 893.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.