Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1972

Pifer v. Pifer

Pifer v. Pifer
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 13, 1972 · Mann, Nulty, Pierce
270 So. 2d 43; 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5716 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pifer v. Pifer

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The amount ordered for support of these parties’ five children is not unreasonable, *44but the award of attorney’s fees is predicated upon evidence which clearly takes into account work done by appellee’s lawyers on matters unrelated to the present case, and 'should be reconsidered by the trial judge. See Scanlon v. Scanlon, Fla.App. 1st 1963, 154 So.2d 899.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

PIERCE, C. J., and MANN and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.