Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1972

Mack v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 12, 1972 · Barkdull, Haverfield, Pearson

270 So. 2d 382; 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5740 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Nichols v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Jones v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
J.G. v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Scott v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Meggett v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1978)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant-appellant, Anthony Eugene Mack, seeks reversal of his conviction and sentence after being found guilty on the charge of carrying a concealed firearm. Two police officers stopped defendant after noticing a suspicious bulge in his right pocket. The officers seized a revolver from defendant and subsequently an information was filed charging him with carrying a concealed firearm in violation of F.S. § 790.01, F.S.A. Pursuant to the trial court’s adjudication defendant was sentenced to sixty (60) days in the Dade County Jail.

On appeal it is contended that the trial judge deprived defendant of a fair trial by repeatedly displaying a lack of neutrality toward defendant. No objections, however, were made at trial to any of the alleged incidents of misconduct. Since the errors complained of by defendant are *383not fundamental they cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. Dickenson v. State, Fla.App. 1972, 261 So.2d 561; Scarpati v. State, Fla.App.1969, 224 So.2d 335; Mahone v. State, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 769; Worthington v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 728.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence herein appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.