Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1973

Rhoades v. Sweet

Rhoades v. Sweet
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 17, 1973 · Carroll, Haverfield, Pearson
276 So. 2d 221; 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6905 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Rhoades v. Sweet

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellants were petitioners in a mandamus proceeding in the circuit court. The circuit judge denied the petition for a writ of mandamus and this appeal followed. The appellants have failed to show error because mandamus is a discretionary writ which will issue only upon the showing of a clear legal right in the relator to the performance of a ministerial act. See State ex rel. Eichenbaum v. Cochran, Fla.1959, 114 So.2d 797. See also State ex rel. Long v. Carey, 121 Fla. 515, 164 So. 199 (1935).

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.