Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1973

Steele v. State

Steele v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 8, 1973 · Carroll, Donald, Rawls, Wigginton
277 So. 2d 316; 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6726 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Steele v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of her judgment of conviction and sentence based upon a jury verdict finding her guilty of second degree murder.

The principal point on appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. We have carefully reviewed the record on appeal and find therein competent and sufficient evidence to sustain the judgment. Two eyewitnesses offered testimony in support of the charge made against appellant which, if believed by the jury, supported each element of the offense.1

We have given consideration to appellant’s remaining point on appeal but find it to be without substantial merit. The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ„ concur.

. Darty v. State (Fla.App. 1964) 161 So.2d 864.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.