Biggs v. Locklear
Biggs v. Locklear
283 So. 2d 398
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Biggs v. Locklear
Concurring Opinion
(specially concurring) :
I am concurring only on the premise that the erroneous evidentiary ruling which permitted the receipt into evidence of the self serving cancelled checks and stubs was harmless in view of the other evidence adduced in this non-jury trial.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.