Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant, defendant in the trial court, seeks review of a judgment and sentence of eighteen months in the state penitentiary for buying, receiving or concealing stolen property.
Three points are raised by appellant for our consideration: (1) the testimony of the district operating manager of the Firestone Tire and Rubber Company was inadmissible hearsay; (2) the evidence was insufficient to prove that tires found in defendant’s home were those stolen from Firestone’s private siding; and (3) the evidence was insufficient to prove defendant’s guilty knowledge that tires he purchased were stolen.
No reversible error having been demonstrated the judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.