Tempera v. Lido Spa
Tempera v. Lido Spa
291 So. 2d 640; 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7930
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Tempera v. Lido Spa
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a summary final judgment. In entering its judgment, the court specifically considered certain evi
3{í i{c ‡ ‡
“1. By agreement of counsel, the^ Court considered three photographs marked Plaintiff’s exhibits for identification 1, 2 and 3; identified in the deposition of witness Koenig taken August 7, 1972, and attached to Plaintiffs copy of the deposition which was handed to the Court during the hearing.”
* * * * * *
Having determined that the photographs considered by the court were not made a part of the record at any time and are not now before us, we affirm upon the authority of the rule stated in McEachin v. McEachin, Fla.App. 1963, 154 So.2d 894, 898. See Hollander v. Nolan Brown Motors, Inc., Fla.App. 1973, 272 So.2d 9.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.