Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1974

Grimes v. State

Grimes v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 15, 1974 · Downey, Mager, Walden
291 So. 2d 643; 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7932 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Grimes v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The complained of portion of the Prosecutor’s closing argument, viewed in light of the whole argument and the Court’s instructions, were not of sufficient harm and moment as to dictate a reversal of the defendant’s judgment of conviction of a crime. James v. State, 263 So.2d 284 (2nd D.C.A.Fla. 1972); Wingate v. State, 232 So.2d 44 (3rd D.C.A.Fla. 1970); and Johnson v. State, 140 Fla. 443, 191 So. 847 (1939).

Affirmed.

WALDEN, MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.