Scholen v. State
Scholen v. State
Opinion of the Court
Defendant-appellant was informed against, tried by jury, found guilty and sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the state penitentiary for assault with intent to commit rape.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying defense counsel’s motion for judgment of acquittal where the evidence was insufficient to prove the requi
After a review of the record on appeal, we conclude that the factual issue of defendant’s voluntary desistance before consummation was submitted properly to the jury and there being sufficient competent evidence contained therein to support the jury in its verdict, we will not disturb the judgment. See 2 Fla.Jur. Appeal § 344 (1963).
Accordingly, the judgment herein appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.