Petringelo v. State
Petringelo v. State
Opinion of the Court
Pursuant to a negotiated plea and sentence appellant was sentenced to life in prison for first degree murder and to concurrent lesser terms for three forgeries. He has, however, in accordance with Ash-by v. State,
Appellant makes no substantial Miranda argument, but his principal assault on the order assailed is bottomed on his contention that his admissions were otherwise involuntarily made. He charges improper police interrogation which, he says, amounted to impermissible coercion that so operated on his volition as to render the admissions involuntary. We have carefully scrutinized the entire record and find that the trial court’s finding that the statements and admissions of appellant were voluntarily made is amply supported by the record.
No reversible error having been made to appear, therefore, the judgments and sentences appealed from should be, and they are hereby, affirmed.
. (Fla.App.2d, 1969), 228 So.2d 400.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.