Frost v. Dascher

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Frost v. Dascher, 305 So. 2d 13 (1974)
Johnson, Rawls, Spector

Frost v. Dascher

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant’s right to assert his proprietary interest in the corporate stock which is the subject matter of this action or his right to assert such claims as he may have against the estate herein in the probate court.

RAWLS, C. J., and SPECTOR, J., concur. JOHNSON, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

JOHNSON, Judge

(dissenting):

I must disagree with the conclusion of the majority opinion by this Court in this case. There were too many disputed facts to warrant the entry of a summary judgment. I think the defendant-appellant should have been given the chance to explain the circumstances and facts surrounding the whole transaction. Therefore, I’d reverse for a hearing on the merits.

Reference

Full Case Name
Meryll FROST v. Robert E. DASCHER and Ferrin C. Campbell, as Administrator of the Estate of Hortense Marie Kertennis
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published