Cribb v. Ellison

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Cribb v. Ellison, 310 So. 2d 445 (1975)
1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14057
Boyer, Johnson, McCord

Cribb v. Ellison

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We have carefully examined the record' on appeal and the briefs filed by able counsel. Although the evidence giving rise to the entry of the final judgment based upon a jury verdict which is here appealed was in conflict, those conflicts were resolved by the trier of the fact for whose judgment we may not substitute ours. We find no error of law as applied to those facts. Further, the briefs of the parties reveal that each point here presented has been heretofore determined by decisions of this Court and of the Supreme Court of Florida. (See Thompson v. Jacobs, et al., Fla.App. 1st 1975, 314 So.2d 797, 1975; Kerr v. Caraway, Sup.Ct.Fla.1955, 78 So.2d 571; Myers v. Korbly, Fla.App. 2nd 1958, 103 So.2d 215 and Central Hardware Co. v. Stampler, Fla.App. 3rd 1965, 180 So.2d 205) Nothing would be added to the jurisprudence of this State by again discussing those points here.

Appellant having failed to demonstrate prejudicial error, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, Acting C. J., and BOYER and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Gurney A. CRIBB, Jr. v. Ralph J. ELLISON, Individually, and Port Carriers, Inc., a corporation
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published