Ralston Purina Co. v. Webb

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Ralston Purina Co. v. Webb, 310 So. 2d 748 (1975)
1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14066
Boyer, McCord, Mills

Ralston Purina Co. v. Webb

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment rendered in favor of appellee.

A careful examination of the record on appeal conclusively establishes the absence of any genuine triable issue of a material fact and that appellee was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is

Affirmed.

BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS, J., concur. McCORD, J., dissents.

Dissenting Opinion

McCORD

(dissenting).

On Motion for Summary Judgment, all reasonable inferences must be considered in a light most favorable to the party moved against. In my view, there are material issues of fact on the question of whether or not Lester A. Bell, Jr., son-in-law of W. C. Webb and also a salesman for appellant, was acting as Webb’s authorized agent when he incurred the debt here sued upon in Webb’s name. Such precludes the grant of summary judgment and I, therefore, dissent.

Reference

Full Case Name
RALSTON PURINA COMPANY v. Linda WEBB, of the Estate of Wilmont Clyde Webb
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published