Sears v. Moomey
Sears v. Moomey
312 So. 2d 481; 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 14960
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Sears v. Moomey
Opinion of the Court
Sears, Roebuck & Company, via' these two consolidated interlocutory appeals, seeks to set aside a default judgment entered against it. Being unsuccessful in the trial court, it appeals and presents seven points. We have considered each in the light of argument and all appellate advices. As much as we are dedicated to the proposition that where possible issues should be adjudicated upon the merits, we are unable to find legal error or any basis for reversal. Service of process was, in fact, made and it had actual notice of the proceedings. The complaints of Sears are either lacking in merit or else of some small moment as to constitute harmless error.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.