Sall v. Luxenberg

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Sall v. Luxenberg, 313 So. 2d 775 (1975)
1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13772
Dow, Mager, Ney, Owen

Sall v. Luxenberg

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs and oral argument and after examination of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated. The granting of separate trials is discretionary and, in particular, in the instant case where the issues of tender, consideration, fraud and misrepresentation are so intermingled and entwined it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in denying separate trials on the issues raised by the pleadings. Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed.

OWEN, C. J., and MAGER and DOW-NEY, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Walter G. SALL, Individually and as Trustee, and Naomi Sail, his wife v. Kenneth LUXENBERG
Cited By
3 cases
Status
Published