Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1975

Lail v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 13, 1975 · Grid, Ley, Mager, Walden, William

314 So. 2d 234; 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Austin v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Lewis v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Garcia v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Defendant being in gross violation of Rule 3.200, F.R.Cr.P., and there being no good cause displayed to support a court waiver of its requirements, it is our view that the trial court correctly administered the Rule within the allowable limits of his discretion in excluding defendant’s alibi witness. Chester v. State, 276 So.2d 76 (2d DCA Fla. 1973). See Williams v. State, 264 So.2d 106 (4th DCA Fla. 1972).

Affirmed.

WALDEN and MAGER, JJ„ and GRID-LEY, WILLIAM C., Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.