Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1975

Williams v. Chesser

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 2, 1975 · Johnson, Mills, Rawls

314 So. 2d 594; 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13645 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Janes v. Janes, 153 Fla. 716, 15 So.2d 677 (1943); Section 689.10, Florida Statutes; and Chasteen v. Chasteen, 213 So.2d 509 (Fla.App. 1968).

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.

070rehearing

*595ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Appellants-defendants correctly urge that the Court’s per curiam opinion of 2 May 1975, affirming the trial court, mistakenly cites as authority Janes v. Janes, 153 Fla. 716, 15 So.2d 677 (1943); Section 689.10, Florida Statutes; and Chasteen v. Chasteen, 213 So.2d 509 (Fla.App. 1968). However, the Court does not recede from its affirmance.

It is the Court’s opinion that the trial court’s judgment of partition correctly recites the findings of fact and the law applicable thereto.

Petition for rehearing denied.

RAWLS, C. J. and MILLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.