Anderson v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Anderson v. State, 314 So. 2d 595 (1975)
1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13646
Cross, Mager, Walden

Anderson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record on appeal and after due consideration of the briefs we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been .clearly demonstrated. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting) :

I respectfully dissent because of the trial error in refusing to order the State to reveal the identity of the confidential informant. Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957) and Spataro v. State, 179 So.2d 873 (2d DCA Fla. 1965).

I would reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reference

Full Case Name
Cloyzell ANDERSON v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published