Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1975

Anderson v. State

Anderson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 20, 1975 · Cross, Mager, Walden
314 So. 2d 595; 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 13646 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Anderson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon a review of the record on appeal and after due consideration of the briefs we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been .clearly demonstrated. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is Affirmed.

CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur. WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting) :

I respectfully dissent because of the trial error in refusing to order the State to reveal the identity of the confidential informant. Roviaro v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 77 S.Ct. 623, 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957) and Spataro v. State, 179 So.2d 873 (2d DCA Fla. 1965).

I would reverse and remand for a new trial.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.