Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1975

Wing v. Norton Co.

Wing v. Norton Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 26, 1975 · Cross, Owen, Walden
319 So. 2d 98; 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15272 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Wing v. Norton Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS and OWEN, JJ., concur. WALDEN, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

WALDEN, Chief Judge

(dissenting):

Under the facts of this case it is my opinion that Norton Company was involved *99with interstate and intrastate transactions so that the state is empowered to require Norton to qualify to do business. I would reverse upon authority of Eli Lilly and Company v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc., 366 U.S. 276, 81 S.Ct. 1316, 6 L.Ed.2d 288 (1961).

I do, therefore, dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑