Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1975

Schonfeld v. Barrich Telephone Answering Service, Inc.

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 7, 1975 · Haverfield, Hendry, Pearson

320 So. 2d 30; 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 15388 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Cady v. Laws (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Abe Schonfeld and Answer-Phone of Hollywood, Inc., have petitioned this court *31for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review the trial court’s denial of their motion for a mandatory injunction pendente lite. At the time of oral argument, it appeared that the remedy of an interlocutory appeal was available and the certiorari should be denied under the rule as stated in Eristavi-Tchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association, 1944, 154 Fla. 100, 16 So.2d 730, at 735.

Thereupon, in proceeding to consider the merits of the cause, and now in treating the petition as an interlocutory appeal, we hold that no reversible error is shown. See Hines v. Dozer, Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 548.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.