Dixon v. AVM Corp.
Dixon v. AVM Corp.
325 So. 2d 415; 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19121
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dixon v. AVM Corp.
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO REVIEW ’SUPERSEDEAS
Appellants, having filed an interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion for change of venue, here seek appellate review of an order fixing the amount of a supersedeas bond at $50,000, pursuant to Rule 5.10, F.A.R.
Since the order of the trial court failed to specify the conditions of the bond, we
Accordingly, the motion to review the order in question is denied without prejudice to future review of an appropriate order fixing the terms and conditions of a supersedeas bond.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.