Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1976

Groves v. Leo

Groves v. Leo
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 14, 1976 · Cross, Mager, Walden
332 So. 2d 364; 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15140 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Groves v. Leo

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Certiorari denied.

MAGER and CROSS, JJ., concur. WALDEN, C. J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Concurring in Part

WALDEN, Chief Judge

(dissenting in part; concurring in part) :

I concur with the majority except as to appellant’s third point. It is my opinion that the jury correctly and with clear in-tendment determined the question of liability (but not damages). Thus, the trial court should have entered judgment on the issue of liability saving only the issue of damages for re-trial. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Turpak, 225 So.2d 340 (2d DCA Fla. 1969).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.