Wilt v. State
Wilt v. State
333 So. 2d 556; 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15186
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Wilt v. State
Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of loitering or prowling pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 856.-021. On this appeal, it is urged that the evidence is insufficient. The requirements for a conviction under this statute have been fully discussed in State v. Ecker, Fla. 1975, 311 So.2d 104. Tested against the guidelines set out in that opinion, we hold the evidence was fully sufficient in all particulars. See also B.A.A. v. State, Fla.App. 1976, 333 So.2d 553.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.