Clements v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Clements v. State, 340 So. 2d 1183 (1976)
1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15836
Alderman, Cross, Mager

Clements v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon due consideration of the briefs of the parties and the record herein we are of the opinion that appellant’s motion to vacate pursuant to Rule 3.850 contains legally sufficient allegations which, if true, would entitle petitioner to relief. Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971). Furthermore, inasmuch as the record does not conclusively demonstrate that such allegations are not true an evidentiary hearing is required. McClendon v. Wainwright, 280 So.2d 703 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973).

REVERSED AND REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings.

MAGER, Ci J., and CROSS and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Frankie L. CLEMENTS v. STATE of Florida
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published