Bailey v. Robinson

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Bailey v. Robinson, 344 So. 2d 930 (1977)
1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 22710
Boyer, McCord, Mills

Bailey v. Robinson

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Upon considering the briefs, the record and oral argument, we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the orders appealed are affirmed and the case of E. Lamar Bailey and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates v. Nathan Leo Linzy and Patricia J. Linzy is remanded to the trial court for a jury trial on the claim for damages made by Nathan Leo Linzy and Patricia J. Linzy against E. Lamar Bailey and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates.

BOYER, C. J., and MILLS and McCORD, JJ., concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
E. Lamar BAILEY and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates, a partnership v. Elbert C. ROBINSON and Berna Cotten Robinson, his wife, Appellees E. Lamar BAILEY and Ernest Bailey, d/b/a E. Lamar Bailey Associates, a partnership v. Nathan Leo LINZY and Patricia J. Linzy
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published