Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1977

Schmotzer v. Poisson

Schmotzer v. Poisson
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 7, 1977 · Alderman, Dauksch, Mager
345 So. 2d 769 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Schmotzer v. Poisson

Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

The Appellants, by interlocutory appeal under Fla.App. Rule 4.2, seek review of an Order denying intervention below. The Order says β€œthe motion to intervene of various persons filed October 27, 1976 is hereby denied.” Only the Order is before us so we shall assume jurisdiction under our authority under Fla.App. Rule 4.2 as an interlocutory appeal since the briefs agree the original action was one sounding in equity.

But after assuming jurisdiction we have no choice but to affirm since no other record or essential pleadings are before us. Pierson v. Sharp, 283 So.2d 880 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973). Johnson v. Town of Eatonville, 203 So.2d 664 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967). Also see Fla.App. Rule 4.2 and Fla.App. Rule 4.5.

AFFIRMED.

MAGER, C. J., and ALDERMAN, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.