Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1977

Hernandez v. Parrott

Hernandez v. Parrott
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 17, 1977 · No. 76-673 · Barkdull, Hendry, Nathan
346 So. 2d 1213; 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16006 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Hernandez v. Parrott

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

BARKDULL, Judge.

In an intersectional accident case, tried before a jury, with issues as to the negligence of both the plaintiff-driver and the defendant-driver, the trial court permitted evidence that the plaintiff-driver and the owner of the automobile he was driving settled property damage claims with one of the defendants. This should not have been permitted into evidence. See: Babcock v. Flowers, 144 Fla. 479, 198 So. 326, wherein the following syllabus is found:

* ‘ * * * * *
“4. In' tort action for personal injuries, the admission of testimony, over defendant’s objection that the defendant had stated that he would take care of plaintiff’s hospital bills was error since an agreement to pay expenses of an injured person constitutes no admission of actionable negligence on the part of the person making such agreement.”
Scanned image of a quoted passage in this opinion. The text of this passage is not available in machine-readable form.

*1214The other points urged for reversal have been examined and found to be without merit.

The final judgment and the jury verdict adverse to the appellant, plaintiff-driver in the trial court, be and the same are hereby reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded, with directions.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.