We are asked to reverse an award of lump sum alimony, permanent alimony and attorney’s fees to the wife upon the ground that these awards were an abuse of discretion. Our review of the record in the light of the briefs and the oral argument shows that these awards are within the discretion of the trial judge as set forth in Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1976); and Herzog v. Herzog, 346 So.2d 56 (Fla. 1977).

Affirmed.