Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1977

Pinder v. Pinder

Pinder v. Pinder
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 20, 1977 · Anstead, Cross, Dauksch
348 So. 2d 564 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Pinder v. Pinder

Dissenting Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

It appears the trial court entered an Order reducing the husband’s obligation to pay support where the only pleading upon which the court based this Order was the wife’s Motion for Contempt for non-payment of support. Goff v. Goff, 151 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963); Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So.2d 334 (Fla. 1957).

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CROSS, J., concurs. ANSTEAD, J., concurs specially. DAUKSCH, J., dissents, with opinion.

Concurring Opinion

ANSTEAD, Judge,

concurring specially:

The trial court’s order with respect to temporary support should be affirmed on the authority of Burton v. Burton, 216 So.2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.