Dismucke v. State
Dismucke v. State
350 So. 2d 106
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Dismucke v. State
Opinion of the Court
Having considered the records, briefs and arguments of the parties we conclude that no reversible error occurred. Moreover we deem that if error occurred by the admission into evidence of telephone company records as to certain calls made by state witness Beal, the error was only harmless. See Pickrell v. State, 301 So.2d 473 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1974), cert. denied, Fla., 314 So.2d 585.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.