Appellant’s motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540 was denied by the trial court. On this appeal, appellant asserts that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying the motion. Our review of the record convinces us that no abuse of discretion has been shown. All of the errors *1146alleged could have been urged upon an appeal from the final judgment. See Butler v. Butler, 172 So.2d 899, 902 (Fla.3d DCA 1965), and cases cited therein.

Affirmed.