Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1977

Hampton v. State

Hampton v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 9, 1977 · Anstead, Dauksch, Letts
351 So. 2d 1101; 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16738 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hampton v. State

Concurring Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge,

concurring specially:

This appeal involves the question presented in Pace v. State, 350 So.2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA, Opinion filed June 24, 1977), in which I dissented. See also dissent upon denial of rehearing, Opinion filed October 11, 1977. The rule is now established that the trial court may impose the restriction discussed in Pace, supra. Therefore, I concur in the result here but do not recede from my opinion in that dissent.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Heath, 343 So.2d 13 (Fla. 1977).

ANSTEAD and LETTS, JJ., concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs specially, with opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑