Kendall Mall, Inc. v. Churchill's Hair Designer to Men & Women, Inc.
Kendall Mall, Inc. v. Churchill's Hair Designer to Men & Women, Inc.
358 So. 2d 1190; 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16008
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Kendall Mall, Inc. v. Churchill's Hair Designer to Men & Women, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
The only point raised in this appeal by the defendant-lessor from an adverse final money judgment in an action for breach of lease, is that the plaintiff-lessee failed to properly prove its damages. Having considered the contentions raised in the parties’ briefs in the light of the record on appeal and the transcript of the non-jury trial, we are of the opinion that no reversible error has been demonstrated because the award of damages is supported by unrefuted competent substantial evidence.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.