Truckdrivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 512 v. Cadle
Truckdrivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 512 v. Cadle
360 So. 2d 435; 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 16239
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Truckdrivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 512 v. Cadle
Opinion of the Court
Having examined the records and briefs and hearing oral argument it appears that the appellant has failed to demonstrate prejudicial error. The judgment appealed is therefore affirmed.
Appellee’s motion for attorney’s fees for services incident to this appeal is granted. (See F.S. 447.17 and F.S. 59.46.) We therefore remand to the trial court for the sole purpose of conducting such proceedings as may be necessary relevant to the fixing of such fees incident to this appeal.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.