Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1978

Brooker v. State

Brooker v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 27, 1978 · Boardman, Ott, Scheb
362 So. 2d 719 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Brooker v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court. However, we agree with appellant that there are imperfections in his sentence. The present sentence does not specify the amount of credit for time served as Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1977), requires. Knight v. State, 349 So.2d 232 (Fla.2d DCA 1977). Moreover, the phrase “at hard labor” in the sentence is improper. Knight v. State, supra. Therefore, we remand the case for correction of the sentence, and appellant need not be present at that time.

BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.