This is the second appearance of this case before this Court. In Davis v. State, 356 So.2d 1252 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), the facts were stated. The conviction on Count I for attempted trespass on a conveyance is now before us for review. In view of this Court’s more recent pronouncements on the issues raised under the Count I conviction in the case of In the Interest of M. E., 357 So.2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), we find no error in the Count I conviction and judgment and sentence below are therefore affirmed.

AFFIRMED.