Upon considering the briefs, the record, and oral argument, we find no reversible error.

Accordingly, the final order is affirmed.

concurring specially.

I concur in affirmance but only because of the language of Slaughter v. State ex rel. Harrell, 245 So.2d 126 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971) wherein this court stated:

“Mandamus is a harsh and extraordinary remedy. It is available to enforce a legal right that has already been clearly established, but not to establish a legal right. * * * ” (245 So.2d at page 128)