Parliament Ins. Co. v. That Girl in Miami, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ramos v. Ayala (Florida Circuit Courts 1985)
- WIMBLEDON TOWNHOUSE CONDO. 1 ASS'N, INC. v. Kessler (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
- Williams v. Brochu (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
- Jordan v. National Grange Mutual Insurance (W. Va. 1990)
- Unicare Health Facilities, Inc. v. Mort (Fla. 1989)
- Mort v. Unicare Health Facilities, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
- Ahmed v. Lane Pontiac-Buick, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- McDermott v. City of Clearwater (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- Godbey v. Walsh (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
- Seminole Colony, Inc. v. Stanko (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
- River Road Constr. Co. v. Ring Power Corp. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
- Encompass Inc. v. Alford (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
- Frank v. Engel Van Lines, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
PARLIAMENT INSURANCE COMPANY, a Foreign Corporation, Appellant,
v.
THAT GIRL IN MIAMI, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Jesse W. Miller, North Miami, for appellant.
Stabinski, Funt, Levine & Vega and Regina F. Zelonker, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BARKDULL and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
After an insurance company was sued by its insured, immediately prior to trial it made an offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 1.442, R.C.P., which was accepted and a judgment was entered in accordance with the offer. The insured then moved for and received attorney's fees pursuant to Section 627.428, Florida Statutes (1975), and the company appealed contending that because of the offer for judgment it had no liability for attorney's fees. We disagree.
The effect of the judgment was res adjudicata on the issues. Hay v. Sailsbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617 (1926). If an insurance company wants to make an offer of settlement which includes attorney's fees, it should do so. In this connection, see: Hernandez v. Travelers Insurance Company, 331 So.2d 329 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). In the instant case the insured recovered a judgment against his insurer on a policy. Therefore, pursuant to the terms of Section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1975), it is provided that in such instance the insured is entitled to attorney's fees.
The order under review is affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.