Pitts v. State
Pitts v. State
365 So. 2d 1080; 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14122
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Pitts v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant seeks review of a summary denial of his motion pursuant to Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850. We affirm.
The record proper clearly refutes the allegations of the motion and, therefore, the order appealed should be affirmed. See: Davis v. State, 277 So.2d 790 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Williams v. State, 296 So.2d 578 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974); Bohn v. State, 354 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.