Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1979

Peterson Outdoor Advertising v. Department of Transportation

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 23, 1979 · No. II-88 · Booth, Ervin, Mills

369 So. 2d 94; 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14767 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This cause is REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Court’s opinion in Walker v. State Department of Transportation, 366 So.2d 96, 1979.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and BOOTH, J., concur. ERVIN, J., concurs in part and dissents in part.

Concurring in Part

ERVIN, Judge,

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur in the conclusion reached by the majority only because it does not appear from the record that Peterson received that notice required by § 479.07(3), Fla.Stat. (1975). I otherwise dissent for the reasons stated in my concurring and dissenting opinion in White Advertising International v. Dept. of Transportation, 368 So.2d 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.