Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1979

Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. City of Cape Coral

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 16, 1979 · Boardman, Grimes, Hobson

369 So. 2d 969; 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 14096 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Thomas Machinery v. Ainsworth International (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Thomas Mach., Inc. v. Ainsworth Int'l, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Thomas Mach., Inc. v. Ainsworth Int'l, LLC (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Trucap Grantor Trust 2010-1 v. Pelt (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Skyrme v. RJ REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2011)
Harry Pepper & Associates, Inc. v. City of Cape Coral (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We originally requested a response to this petition for certiorari because we perceived the petition as containing substantial merit. However, upon consideration we note that the order refusing petitioners’ right to amend their complaint is interlocutory in nature, and petitioners will always have an adequate remedy to attack the propriety of the order by way of appeal from the final judgment. Pic v. Hoyt Development Co., Inc., 309 So.2d 586 (Fla.2d DCA 1975); Wright v. Sterling Drugs, Inc., 287 So.2d 376 (Fla.2d DCA 1973).

Accordingly, the petition for writ of cer-tiorari is denied.

GRIMES, C. J., and HOBSON and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.