Granda v. Siegendorf

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Granda v. Siegendorf, 370 So. 2d 1227 (1979)
1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15027
Hendry, Hoe, Hubbart

Granda v. Siegendorf

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is granted, the motion to dismiss is denied, and the respondent judicial referee is directed to hold a full medical mediation hearing with all three panel members present based on the authority of Grossman v. Duncan, 371 So.2d 142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Hewitt v. Caffee, 368 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Diggett v. Conkling, 368 So.2d 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We are confident that it will be unnecessary for this court to issue a peremptory writ of mandamus and that the respondent judicial referee upon receipt of this opinion will comply with this court’s directive as stated above. It is so ordered.

Reference

Full Case Name
Agustin F. GRANDA, M.D., and Luis R. Caceres, M.D. v. The Honorable Arden M. SIEGENDORF, Circuit Judge of the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Florida, and Miguel Angel Rios
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published